Sunday, January 4, 2009
104 in 2009 Week 1: Lessons in Darkness and Pickup on South Street
Werner Herzog, 1992
I love Werner Herzog. Whether eating his shoe, hauling a steamboat up a mountain, pulling Joachim Phoenix from a wrecked car, or continuing an interview after getting shot by an air rifle, the man continually proves himself to be better than everyone else. He’s basically my hero.
That said, I didn’t enjoy Lessons in Darkness very much. Herzog is probably best known for his documentaries, but I tend to prefer his narrative works – although, to be fair, I prefer narrative films to documentaries in general. It’s more of a clear distinction with Herzog than with many other filmmakers, however, because his style of documentary leans in a very unstructured direction – he likes to present you with images and music, maybe a little narration, and leave it at that. There is rarely a strong through-line or story to be told – it’s all about the experience. In general, I think this is laudable – but in practice, I just can’t handle it for the length of a full movie. The somewhat overbearing (particularly the choral passages) classical music score didn’t help.
This is not to say there weren’t some amazing things to be seen. My favorites were the melted, twisted oil reservoir (which I thought was a tarp at first) and the bit at the end where the firefighters re-ignited some of the oil wells. And, while there was not much narration, what we did get was in Herzog’s own voice, which is second only to Roger Corman for being soothing and comforting.
5.5/10
Pickup on South Street
Samuel Fuller, 1953
I’ve not, historically, been a fan of Samuel Fuller. He’s a prominent figure in the history of cinema, so I keep trying to watch his movies – but so far (Shock Corridor, House of Bamboo), it hasn’t really worked out. The third time has turned out to be the charm, however, with this rather wonderful little film.
I chalk the difference between this and the other two Fuller films up to Thelma Ritter’s Oscar-nominated performance, mostly. She manages to convey a lot about her character and engender a lot of sympathy without a lot of effort – and in fact, the parts of her final scene in which she gets to speechify about herself are her weakest moments. The movie also benefits from the presence of the late, great Richard Widmark, in one of his more heroic roles.
There are a few sour notes in the mix. The ending (in particular, the final line) is kind of awkward and kind of edges the film in a different thematic direction than it seemed to be going. Also, our heroes fall deeply, deeply in love at a breakneck pace (as movie characters from the 50’s are wont to do). It’s a little ridiculous. Still, the pacing is nice and lean, the dialogue is snappy, and the fight scenes are remarkably brutal for the era. In particular, keep an eye out for the scene in which Richard Kiley assaults Jean Peters, all done in one take (with no stuntwoman!).
8/10
Progress: Par
Friday, January 2, 2009
Total Success
Now, at the end of 2008, I see that I managed to read a whole 17 books over the course of the year (see them here). Hooray for me! More than one per month!
. . . actually, that's still kind of sad. But since it is an improvement, I'm calling it a win.
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Total Failure
I just tallied up my movie viewing for this year. Here are the stats:
Total movies viewed: 93
Total movies viewed for the first time: 57
Total movies viewed for the first time that were not new releases (from 2007 or 2008): 21
Kind of sad, isn’t it? Quite a ways from my peak in 2005, where the three figures above were 253, 177, and 129, respectively. If I didn’t know better, I’d say my Netflix account was being wasted. Hmm. . . .come to think of it, I’m not sure I do know better.
Of the three figures, the one that most concerns me is the number of older movies I watched for the first time. My viewing of new theatrical releases is pretty consistent year-to-year (between 20-25 at the end of the year, which balloons up to 40-50 by the middle of the next) and rewatching things is just gravy, really. The ultimate goal is the exploration of the back catalogue of cinema. This year, I didn’t even average two new old movies per month. For the record, here are the 21, in order of preference:
Starship Troopers 2: Hero of the Federation
Nine of those (including most of the worst) were part of my typical October festivities. Six of them were movie club picks. One was a movie we watched in order to play the action movie card game. That leaves five movies that I just watched of my own accord - and one of them is only a half hour long. This will not do.
So here is my solution. I am hereby deciding to watch at least two older movies that I’ve never seen each week of 2009. To keep me honest, I’m going to write about them here. These may be full-blown reviews, or they may be single word entries. If I can keep this up, I’ll have seen 104 old movies by the end of the year, which will be much more like it. If I can't keep this up, then I am counting on all of you to mock and shame me.
Sunday, December 21, 2008
Movie Saturday Memories, Volume 7
SAFETY IN NUMBERS
This was a new script I had written on a whim the night before Rachel selected her three preferred scripts for Movie Saturday 2.08. My inspiration came from Philip K. Dick, who claimed that he never actually wrote science fiction, but rather that all of his work was fantasy in which something non-literal was made literal. In this case I chose the idea of security vs. spontaneity in mate selection, coupled with the desire that people sometimes have to change one another. Then I literalized it, with the creation of a robot duplicate.
I don’t remember what the other choices were, but obviously, since I’m writing about it now, this was the selection. I then prepared myself for some brutal rewriting, since a) I had forced Trevor to spend a lot of time working on Peephole the last time I directed and b) Rachel was in charge of this one. If you’ve read any of the previous Movie Saturday Memories, you’ll know why that filled me with dread. So when I asked her what sort of changes she wanted and she replied with “no, I like it as it is,” I was pretty surprised. And a tad disappointed, admittedly.
This was one of the few movies that required props and costumes, since not every character could be best categorized as “this one guy” or “this one girl”. The scanning equipment was thrift store junk, plus part of a Transformer. The shirts were also thrift store material (explaining the awkward fit) with homemade patches sewn on. It was a bit frightening to watch Rachel sew the patch on to Ben’s shirt while he was wearing it, but everyone escaped intact.
You may have also noticed a bit more camera movement than we usually have. This was the debut of the Movie Saturday dolly, aka some cart we got at Home Depot. Inspired by our makeshift dolly from The Economy, we purchased something that we could rig up more permanently. This was meant to take us to the next level of production, which it kind of did. Unfortunately, that next level started with a Kill Screen. But that’s a story for another time (and that time will occur just a few paragraphs down).
Unfortunately, I have no stories about post-production. Rachel and Mavi staged a mini-gynocratic takeover, so I and the rest of the guys (save for Luke) went and had a long lunch at Casa Bonita instead. Mmm. Casa Bonita. We got kind of sick.
I’m kind of glad I did miss post, however, because it was exceedingly rare for me to see a final movie without watching it come together, bit by bit. Sometimes it can be kind of nice just to watch, especially when the final movie is as good as this. To me, it really did feel like a step up, on a technical level, from what we had been doing previously. This, coupled with the fact that we were beginning to bristle more and more under the single day time constraints, led me to make a fateful decision. I floated it by the rest of the major players, and they all agreed.
Movie Saturday would be no more.
-----
Our intention in killing Movie Saturday was not to stop making movies. We just decided that we had grown as much as we could in the single-day format, and that maybe we could start making slightly longer productions, or spending more time on productions of the same length. It was exciting to think about. I couldn’t wait to get moving on it. We did decide to make one more Movie Saturday first, a big finale that would pay tribute to our past, force us to work in a new, unfamiliar format, and provide us with two movies in one.
The plan was to remake Because it was Dead. It would be rewritten and Hollywood-ed up. More intense drama drama, a fight scene, etc. Maybe we'd even throw in a fart joke. Part of our team would be involved in that. But it wouldn’t be the real Movie Saturday. The real production would be a documentary/mockumentary about the filming of the new Because it was Dead (which was possibly going to be retitled as Dead Reason, by the way). We’d film the filming, interview everyone involved, it was going to be great.
“But Brian,” you’re probably thinking now, “I never saw a Movie Saturday 2.09. What happened to the documentary? And why were you speaking so subjunctively in that last paragraph?”
Well, here’s what happened. We were, for the most part, correct in thinking that we had outgrown Movie Saturday. But there was one thing we overlooked. The most important thing. Movie Saturday provided us with momentum. As long as we had Movie Saturday, we made movies. Once we killed it, we were no longer able to marshal our forces and muster up the manpower to get a movie made. So that’s what happened to the documentary. It never got made. It lives in a magical, imaginary world where it pals around with unicorns and Captain Kirk.
So ended Movie Saturday. Not with a bang, not with a whimper, but with a bang followed in short order by protracted whimpering.
-----
Next Time:
A wrap-up/overview of the whole shebang, and where we go from here.
Sunday, December 14, 2008
Movie Saturday Memories, Volume 6
PEEPHOLE
Pull up a seat, kiddies, this is gonna be a long’n.
I finally got the chance to direct a project, completely and fully, from pre-production onward, thanks to a fortuitous once in a year event. That even was, of course, Halloween. We decided that, in the spirit of the season, we ought to do make a horror movie for the October Movie Saturday. And of course, if we’re making a horror movie, it simply wouldn’t make sense for anyone but me to direct it.
Unfortunately, we didn’t have any horror scripts, so we had to solicit new ones. There were three that we ultimately took under consideration. One was a Vincent Price-esque monologue written by Shawn that was okay, but didn’t have any spark. Nothing much to say about it. The second was one that I wrote, about a man who, after the death of his wife, took over for the ailing boogeyman as a way of finding new meaning to life. I was very pleased with how it came out and was very excited about getting to shoot it. Obviously, that didn’t happen. No one really thought it made sense and it was especially criticized for a stretch in the middle where the chronology broke down and several different time points co-existed in the same scene. This stretch happened to be my favorite part of the script. Ah well, c’est la vie. Maybe someday.
The third script, which we wound up shooting, was written by Trevor PinBlackJamesCockFord. I really didn’t like it much early on. Some of the dialogue was clunky, the pacing was kind of weird, and most of all, it just made me uncomfortable. But then a funny thing happened. When I submitted my top three picks for voting, I also wrote up a little description of what I intended to do with them, directorially speaking. That was when the potential of Peephole became clear to me. Earlier that day I had watched What Have They Done to Solange?, which coincidentally had a scene where a couple of perverts looked through a peephole into the girls’ shower room. This brought a single word to my mind, which solved all of my problems. That word was Giallo. Go ahead, look it up. I even provided a handy link.
----
Sunday, December 7, 2008
Movie Saturday Memories, Volume 5
Try Again
Rachel was in the director’s seat for the fourth production of Season 2, just like she was for the fourth of Season 1. Funny how that works out. This time, she was working from one of Trevor’s scripts. It was originally structured much more naturalistically – the various encounters between Harold, Kim, and Jim could possibly have been a series of events that occurred over time, as events are wont to do. It was only at the end of the script that the truth is revealed – Harold, an old dying man, is stuck revisiting variations of his greatest regret.
I had initially fought against using this script, because I didn’t like the twist ending. In particular, I didn’t like putting that revelation at the end because it didn’t give you time for the ramifications of what you’re seeing to sink in – just 30 seconds of revelation and you’re out. I also thought the various encounters didn’t flow together very well, especially if the viewer was meant to see them as an objective reality. Still, nothing better was available, so we moved ahead.
Somewhere in the middle of shooting, we found a way to satisfy my script problems without changing what everyone else liked about it. The answer was simple – move the old man Harold scene to the beginning so that the events are framed as being in his mind. Unfortunately, the scene wouldn’t fit at the beginning the way it was written, and Trevor was unavailable for a rewrite. I wound up throwing something together in about five minutes between takes, and we had our opening.
-----
This was kind of exciting because we got to shoot on location. The script called for a motel room, which I thought we’d have to fake or pay for– but in actuality, all it took was one phone call and we found ourselves in a real motel room for free. Granted, it was a used motel room, and we had a limited window between the check-out and the arrival of the cleaning crew, but hey – verisimilitude trumps hygiene concerns, right?
This was a very old script that had been passed up multiple times before. It was originally written for Season 1, and was the only Season 2 production for which that was the case. There was always a concern that the plot (man has to call kidnapper at a certain time to negotiate a ransom payment, but loses the number so the hostage is killed) wouldn’t come across. I’m still not sure it does. On the other hand, I think that everything going on in Try Again is completely clear, so take my judgment on this matter with a grain of salt.
-----
Next Week: I finally direct Peephole, and Bruce teaches us all about The Economy.
Friday, December 5, 2008
Ackermonster No More
Because, like all truly great men, his own actions are vastly outweighed by those of the people he inspired. Largely through his magazine, Famous Monsters of Filmland, he exposed an entire generation of writers and directors and special effects artists to the wonders of horror and sci-fi. In fact, he even coined the term "sci-fi."
Try to imagine a world without the accomplishments of the following (and this is a miniscule sample):
Ray Bradbury
Stephen King
Phil Tippett
Rick Baker
Joe Dante
John Landis
Tim Burton
Peter Jackson
It's not a world I would want to live in. It's what the world would look like without Forry Ackerman.
Forrest J. Ackerman was 92. He is survived by every fan of science fiction or horror in the world.